Cerni, T., Di Benedetto, A beneficial., & Rumiati, Roentgen. We. (2021). New sum out of identity and you may intelligence towards the cognitive competences into the higher training. Frontiers inside Psychology, twelve, 2566.
Damian, Roentgen. I., Spengler, Meters., Sutu, A good., & Roberts, B. W. (2019). 16 going on 60-six: A good longitudinal examination of identification balances and change around the half a century. Journal away from Personality and you can Social Therapy, 117(3), 674.
Daurio, A. M., & Taylor, J. (2022). A study of triarchic make of psychopathy and thinking-stated People B personality illness traits. Identification Conditions: Theory, Browse, and you can Treatment, 13(2), 153.
Furnham, An effective., & Monsen, J. (2009). Personality traits and cleverness expect academic college or university grades. Learning and you can private variations, 19(1), 28-33.
Haider, Z. F., & von Stumm, S. (2022). Anticipating informative and you can social–emotional consequences inside emerging adulthood of intelligence, personality, and you may socioeconomic reputation. Diary away from Personality and Societal Therapy.
The netherlands, A good. S., & Roisman, Grams. I. (2008). Huge Five characteristics and you can dating high quality: Self-claimed, observational, and you may psychological facts. Journal regarding Public and private Dating, 25(5), 811-829.
Holley, P., Yabiku, S., & Benin, M. (2006). The partnership between cleverness and you may divorce or separation. Journal from Family Activities, 27(12), 1723-1748.
Hong-Hua, Y., Wen-Qing, F., & Shu-Qiao, Y. (2006). Symptomatology from Class-B Personality Issues regarding Four-Foundation Model Angle. Chinese Psychological state Journal.
Kassenboehmer, S. C., Leung, F., & Schurer, S. (2018). College or university education and you can non-cognitive experience invention. Oxford Monetary Paperwork, 70(2), 538-562.
Lyngstad, T. H. (2004). This new impact regarding parents’ and you may spouses’ degree toward separation costs when you look at the Norway. Market research, 10, 121-142.
Mathes, Age. W., Brennan, S. Meters., Haugen, P. Yards., & Grain, H. B. (1985). Critiques out-of actual attractiveness just like the a purpose of decades. The fresh Record from Personal Mindset, 125(2), 157-168.
Mate value may decline (or not), however it does not appear to be a shield so you’re able to matchmaking creation
McGue, Yards., Anderson, Age. L., Willoughby, Elizabeth., Giannelis, Good., Iacono, W. Grams., & Lee, J. J. (2022). Perhaps not by g alone: Some great benefits of a college education among people with lower levels away from general cognitive function. Cleverness, 92, 101642.
Meier, B. P., Robinson, Yards. D., Carter, M. S., & Hinsz, V. B. (2010). Try social anybody so much more stunning? A zero-associate investigation off agreeableness, extraversion, and you will elegance. Record away from Browse inside the Character, 44(2), 293-296.
Nieuwenhuis, J. (2018). The fresh new interaction between school poverty and you will agreeableness during the predicting instructional attainment. Personality and you will Personal Variations, 127, 85-88.
Standard characteristics of character and you will affectivity because predictors regarding fulfillment when you look at the romantic matchmaking: Proof out-of worry about?and you will mate?product reviews
Tatarunaite, Elizabeth., Playle, R., Hood, K., Shaw, W., & Richmond, S. (2005). Facial elegance: a great longitudinal data. Western Diary away from Orthodontics and you can Dentofacial Orthopedics, 127(6), 676-682.
Sarah Flood, Miriam Queen, Renae Rodgers, Steven Ruggles, J. Robert Warren and Michael Westberry. Incorporated Societal Explore Microdata Series, Most recent Populace Questionnaire: Version ten.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, 2022.
Scott, S. B., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., Allen, Elizabeth. S., & ). Reasons for having divorce case and you will memories away from premarital input: Ramifications to have improving matchmaking knowledge. Couple and Sri Lanka mariГ©e you may Family relations Mindset: Look and exercise, 2(2), 131.
Solomon, B. C., & Jackson, J. J. (2014). Why do personality traits assume splitting up? Numerous pathways courtesy fulfillment. Record out of Identification and Societal Psychology, 106(6), 978.
Vernon, P. An excellent., Villani, V. C., Vickers, L. C., & Harris, J. An effective. (2008). A behavioral hereditary investigation of Black Triad in addition to Big 5. Personality and private Variations, 44(2), 445-452.
Widiger, T. A good., Sellbom, Yards., Chmielewski, M., Clark, L. An excellent., DeYoung, C. G., Kotov, R., … & Wright, A great. G. (2019). Character into the good hierarchical model of psychopathology. Medical Psychological Research, 7(1), 77-ninety-five.
The current CPS investigation usually do not show whether your risk of breakup is additive. Relations you certainly will imply mixed marriage ceremonies provides high or all the way down dangers than simply the entire risks of two anyone. But not, past lookup towards the separation and you may education demonstrates it’s (Lyngstad, 2004). The brand new breakup chance for a few PhD owners is mostly about fifteen%, consistent with the individual likelihood of eight-8% having private PhD owners.
Buss, D. M., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Ray, D. (2017). The latest mate altering theory. Identification and you will Personal Distinctions, 104, 143-149.
